At the time, counsel for the Cochrane Golf Club advised that they would consent to our request to be added providing that doing so did not preclude them from later challenging whether the restrictive covenant applied to each or any of the homeowners. Peter Major (our lawyer) agreed, as that is simply an argument they would always be entitled to raise in this dispute. No ground was given up to reach this agreement. The agreement to add homeowners as Respondents needs to be formalized by way of a Consent Order that will need to be approved by a Justice (it was).
In 2007, the Cochrane Golf Course agreed with the Town of Cochrane and Riverview residents that there would be no further development of golf course lands except for golf course operations in exchange for a small subdivision approval. Golf course ownership are now attempting to renege on that agreement and have taken us to Court. Please help fund our fight to save our golf course and community.
Wednesday, September 22, 2021
Riverview residents successfully added to the save the golf course legal fight
At the time, counsel for the Cochrane Golf Club advised that they would consent to our request to be added providing that doing so did not preclude them from later challenging whether the restrictive covenant applied to each or any of the homeowners. Peter Major (our lawyer) agreed, as that is simply an argument they would always be entitled to raise in this dispute. No ground was given up to reach this agreement. The agreement to add homeowners as Respondents needs to be formalized by way of a Consent Order that will need to be approved by a Justice (it was).
Wednesday, September 1, 2021
Cochrane Golf Club Ltd. applies to Courts to have the Restrictive Covenant removed
Mr. Tom Hong has filed an Affidavit with Court of Queen’s Bench on behalf of the Cochrane Golf Club in which he maintains that operation of the golf course is no longer viable and that this economic circumstance is sufficient argument to declare the existing Restrictive Covenant ("RC") preventing further golf course development as invalid. His evidence includes financial data up to and including 2019 and an Affidavit from his expert witness, Mr, Craig Burkhart, which substantiates Mr. Hong’s position. He also contends that the RC is illegal. The Court Application lists only the Town of Cochrane and does not mention the residential property owners who are listed as benefited lands in the subject RC.
Appellate Court of Alberta dismisses the Cochrane Golf Club appeal
On June 12, 2024, the Appeal Court of Alberta heard oral arguments regarding the Cochrane Golf Club's desire to remove a restrictive c...
-
Last updated June 27, 2024 This blog is a running recap on the evolving legal battle in defending the Restrictive Covenant. When you pledge ...
-
On June 12, 2024, the Appeal Court of Alberta heard oral arguments regarding the Cochrane Golf Club's desire to remove a restrictive c...
-
Good turn-out, but we can't publish faces! A 'Town Hall' meeting hosted April 7, 2022 from 7-9pm at the Cochrane Ranchehouse was...