Wednesday, September 22, 2021

Riverview residents successfully added to the save the golf course legal fight

An agreement has been reached with counsel for the Cochrane Golf Club to add 149 homeowners as Respondents in the Originating Application. As originally filed, we (the residents and lot owners) were excluded from the Application.

Counsel for the residents is Peter Major of McLennan Ross. These homeowners represent 149 of 404 lots listed on the restrictive covenant as benefitted lands. 

The participating Riverview residents have since been collectively identified in the style of cause of this legal action as: Jennifer Foy et al, and we will be identified as such going forward. The suffix “et al” means “and others” and includes all 149 homeowners, as the example shows.


At the time, counsel for the Cochrane Golf Club advised that they would consent to our request to be added providing that doing so did not preclude them from later challenging whether the restrictive covenant applied to each or any of the homeowners. Peter Major (our lawyer) agreed, as that is simply an argument they would always be entitled to raise in this dispute. No ground was given up to reach this agreement. The agreement to add homeowners as Respondents needs to be formalized by way of a Consent Order that will need to be approved by a Justice (it was).

Wednesday, September 1, 2021

Cochrane Golf Club Ltd. applies to Courts to have the Restrictive Covenant removed

Mr. Tom Hong has filed an Affidavit with Court of Queen’s Bench on behalf of the Cochrane Golf Club in which he maintains that operation of the golf course is no longer viable and that this economic circumstance is sufficient argument to declare the existing Restrictive Covenant ("RC") preventing further golf course development as invalid. His evidence includes financial data up to and including 2019 and an Affidavit from his expert witness, Mr, Craig Burkhart, which substantiates Mr. Hong’s position. He also contends that the RC is illegal. The Court Application lists only the Town of Cochrane and does not mention the residential property owners who are listed as benefited lands in the subject RC.

Appellate Court of Alberta dismisses the Cochrane Golf Club appeal

  On June 12, 2024, the Appeal Court of Alberta heard oral arguments regarding the Cochrane Golf Club's desire to remove a restrictive c...